Real Name: Greg S • View Member's Blog Listing
|
| |
|
nibiyabi Member Profile Member Since: 2006-12-13 AIM: you94070 Yahoo: sheehy@sbcglobal.net GTalk: nibiyabi Last Power Points used: 2009-11-05 • Available: now Max Power Points: 2 • Get More Power Points Now Comments |
Subscribe Navigation
Member Stats Rank: 97 Rating:
164 star points#1 Videos: 3 Top 15 Videos: 18 Votes Received: 5103 Average Votes Per Video: 34.25 Votes Cast: 4800 Comments Posted: 1617 • browse Comments Applauded: 16 Sifted Videos: 149 Sift Talk Posts: 17 Quality Sift Talk Posts: 4 Poll Posts: 1 Blog Entries: 10 • browse Dead Pool Fixes: 18 Public Playlists: 4 • browse Profile Views: 16031 Latest Blog Entries by nibiyabi
Highest Ranked Comments Member's Highest Rated Videos |
In reply to this comment by nibiyabi:
*quality
In reply to this comment by nibiyabi:
*promote
In reply to this comment by nibiyabi:
You're right, this is more mesmALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD.
http://www.videosift.com/video/Sam-Beam-Iron-Wine-The-Trapeze-Swinger
/votefish!
In reply to this comment by nibiyabi:
*promote
In reply to this comment by nibiyabi:
*quality
In reply to this comment by nibiyabi:
Which playlist would that be?
In reply to this comment by ninewest:
Video for your playlist
http://www.videosift.com/video/Om-Nom-Nom-Bird
http://www.videosift.com/video/Om-Nom-Nom-Bird
In reply to this comment by nibiyabi:
Hey . . . nice background color by the way.
In reply to this comment by nibiyabi:
*quality
In reply to this comment by nibiyabi:
*quality
*doublepromote
Thanks for the promote, sir!
I'm not sure which side to take on this, but regardless, this post is disingenuous.
>> ^MarineGunrock:
So the only reason you should go to jail is if you damage someone's property or if you harm someone?
According to this prick, Chester jerking off to kiddie porn he downloaded shouldn't go to jail.
Whoever produced the child porn engaged in "harming someone" to say the least, and consumers of this product are the reason the industry exists, so it's not a large logical leap to conclude that Chester falls under the definition of "harming someone".
The guy the takes pictures up girl's skirts shouldn't go to jail.
This is pretty clear-cut. Emotional harm is harm.
The the guy going 130 down the freeway shouldn't go to jail. The guy driving recklessly drunk down the road shouldn't go to jail.
These are getting less and less defensible. "Increasing the probability that you will harm someone by an outrageously insane degree" is virtually equivalent to "harming someone" as far as the law is concerned.
well said,
i really dont know why this would be a touchy subject.
disagree with is methods,but he has a right.
eh..maybe im wrong..
In reply to this comment by nibiyabi:
ABC copyright *dead